home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
091189
/
09118900.016
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1995-02-26
|
4KB
|
86 lines
<text id=89TT2340>
<title>
Sep. 11, 1989: Battle Of The Food Blurbs
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1989
Sep. 11, 1989 The Lonely War:Drugs
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
HEALTH, Page 66
Battle of the Food Blurbs
</hdr><body>
<p>Never mind the flavor, selling health is what matters
</p>
<p> Shopping in a grocery store these days, consumers may
wonder whether they are getting the makings of a meal or taking
their medicine. Packages shout: More calcium! Less sodium! No
cholesterol! Food does not have to taste good, but it must
promise to be good for you.
</p>
<p> Last week Kellogg's announced a new breakfast food aimed at
consumers 35 and older. Judging by the package blurbs, the
cereal appears as well stocked with salutary substances as a
doctor's medicine cabinet. The buzz words: "twelve essential
vitamins and minerals," "low sodium," and "high soluble fiber"
from oat bran and the newest candidate for nutritional
knighthood, psyllium. Oat bran can reduce cholesterol levels,
and psyllium, a grain grown mainly in India, may be a more
potent cholesterol cutter. Even the cereal's name has a
righteous ring: Heartwise. Kellogg's is playing catch-upmanship
with General Mills, which in April launched its own oat bran and
psyllium cereal, Benefit.
</p>
<p> Manufacturers insist that the package labels and
advertising campaigns associated with the new products are
educating consumers about widely accepted dietary principles.
Kellogg's argues that it stops short of making therapeutic
claims for its products. Kellogg's Chairman William LaMothe
maintains that the Heartwise promotion talks in general about
the wisdom of lowering cholesterol in fighting heart disease.
"It doesn't imply efficacy in the product," he declares.
</p>
<p> Traditionally, the Food and Drug Administration has not
allowed explicit health claims concerning foods. But it is
currently trying to develop a policy that would permit certain
claims on food labels. Regulators and companies are arguing
whether products containing psyllium can state that they will
lower cholesterol. The FDA last year refused to allow Procter
& Gamble to promote its psyllium-based laxative Metamucil as a
cholesterol reducer because the company did not provide enough
evidence to support its claim. In turn, Procter & Gamble has
complained to the FDA that General Mills should not be allowed
to claim that Benefit reduces cholesterol.
</p>
<p> Some organizations, like the National Cancer Institute and
the American Heart Association, believe this type of marketing
serves the public. Many health experts, though, contend that
the promotions prey on consumer fears and can be misleading.
Explains Michael Jacobson of the Center for Science in the
Public Interest: "The words may be honest, but the implication
may exaggerate the benefit."
</p>
<p> A few food campaigns have been downright deceptive. Muffins
touted for their high oat-bran content are sometimes loaded
with saturated fats. The Federal Trade Commission has accused
the Campbell Soup Co. of claiming that its soups are low in fat
and cholesterol while failing to disclose that they are also
high in salt.
</p>
<p> One of the greatest dangers from the new marketing approach
may be that consumers will become inured to health messages
altogether as manufacturers hype one wonder ingredient after
another. Says nutritionist Ann Gaba of Columbia University's
Institute of Human Nutrition: "People get to thinking that
there's a food of the month that is the cure-all." Consumers
should remember that good health comes from a total diet, not
an individual product. As Gaba cautions, "One product is not
going to kill you, and one product is not going to save you."
</p>
</body></article>
</text>